{"id":181,"date":"2018-10-31T03:46:27","date_gmt":"2018-10-31T03:46:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/?p=181"},"modified":"2018-11-01T03:28:48","modified_gmt":"2018-11-01T03:28:48","slug":"jargon-the-experts-delight-and-the-novices-bore-supernatant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/2018\/10\/31\/jargon-the-experts-delight-and-the-novices-bore-supernatant\/","title":{"rendered":"Jargon &#8211; The Expert\u2019s Delight and the Novice\u2019s Bore: Supernatant"},"content":{"rendered":"<body><p><\/p><em>Check out this post on scientific jargon that I wrote for my friend Matthew Niederhuber\u2019s blog\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.mattniederhuber.com\/jargon\/2017\/12\/04\/supernatant\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">.jargon<\/a>.<\/em>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-273 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tylerjford.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Supernatant-Turtle-2.jpg?resize=300%2C298\" alt=\"A drawing of turtle floating in an inner tube\" width=\"300\" height=\"298\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tylerjford.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Supernatant-Turtle-2.jpg?resize=300%2C298&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tylerjford.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Supernatant-Turtle-2.jpg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tylerjford.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Supernatant-Turtle-2.jpg?resize=768%2C763&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tylerjford.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Supernatant-Turtle-2.jpg?resize=1024%2C1017&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tylerjford.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Supernatant-Turtle-2.jpg?resize=100%2C100&amp;ssl=1 100w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tylerjford.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Supernatant-Turtle-2.jpg?w=1575 1575w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Every field has jargon. Marketers talk of leads and conversions, cyclists speak of cadence and derailleurs, and programmers speak of grooming, for-loops, and much more. Jargon is everywhere. Both a boon and bane to understanding, jargon makes it difficult for any novice to get started in a field but makes it easy for experts to quickly communicate complex ideas to those in the know. Any word used only by experts in a field can be considered jargon. Scientists however, are perhaps the most egregious users of jargon.<\/p>\n<p>My good friend Matt Niederhuber recently started thinking about how scientists use jargon and has been working on a blog where he introduces readers to the history of scientific jargon. Interestingly, few scientists know where many of the words they use come from, but learning about a piece of scientific jargon\u2019s history can both provide one with a new way to get someone interested in science and reveal something about how science has advanced \u2013 the artistry of language serves as a proxy for the story of discovery.<\/p>\n<h2>Supernatant<\/h2>\n<p>The word \u201csupernatant\u201d is a fantastic example of scientific jargon. I\u2019ve used it a million times but, the first time I saw it I probably thought it meant powerful vapor or something\u2026 I was very wrong. Simply put, the supernatant is the liquid portion left on top when a process produces solids and liquids or multiple distinct liquids.<\/p>\n<p>For example, say you put a bunch of muddy water in a glass and let it sit. After a little while the mud would sink to the bottom and the water would sit on top of it. The water would be the supernatant.<\/p>\n<p>On the face of it, supernatant appears to be a boring, mechanical word, but it has power in its specificity. When doing experiments, researchers often use procedures that separate complex mixtures into liquid and solid portions or multiple distinct liquid portions. The liquid that rests on top is the supernatant. Separating the supernatant from its counterpart may make it easier for a scientist to isolate something for an experiment. For example, when finished growing a bunch of cells, a researcher could separate the solid cells from their liquid waste (the supernatant). The researcher could then continue growing\/using the cells while measuring chemicals in the supernatant. If you tell a fellow researcher to remove the supernatant from a mixture, she will know precisely what you\u2019re talking about.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, supernatant can also be used as an adjective to describe one thing floating on top of another. So, if you wanted to describe the whipped cream floating on top of your hot chocolate, you could call it the \u201csupernatant cream.\u201d While this seems somewhat superfluous (we just expect the cream to float after all), it does add a bit of flourish and specificity to the sentence.<\/p>\n<p>Like the noun form, the adjective has been used extensively in scientific settings. For example, one could say \u201cmix these two solutions together and then remove the supernatant liquid.\u201d However, I don\u2019t really remember anyone using it this way in the lab. This is possibly because you could just say \u201cremove the supernatant\u201d and there\u2019s really no need for the adjective form. Indeed some of the adjective forms like \u201csupernatant fluid, supernatant oil, supernatant liquid, or supernatant water\u201d peak in their usage prior to \u201csupernatant\u201d according to google books so it\u2019s possible that this use is going out of style.<\/p>\n<h2>Floating above \u2013 The Supernatant Breakdown<\/h2>\n<p>Supernatant\u2019s two latin roots, \u201csuper\u201d and \u201cnatant\u201d make perfect sense for its scientific meaning.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Super \u2013 An interesting word on its own with a bunch of different meanings. Here it means \u201cabove\u201d as opposed \u201cgreat\u201d as in \u201cI\u2019m super, thanks for asking!\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Natant \u2013 I didn\u2019t actually realize this was a word before, but natant means swimming or floating. Natant has fallen out of popular usage, but the next time you go to the local pond, you might spot some natant ducks or, my personal favorite, a natant turtle.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Put these together and you get the adjective form \u201cfloating above.\u201d When supernatant is used as noun, it\u2019s just a thing that floats above. In our mud-water example, the water was \u201cfloating above\u201d the mud \u2013 it was the supernatant.<\/p>\n<h2>Nonscientific Uses of Supernatant<\/h2>\n<p>Possibly because it\u2019s meaning is so specific, you don\u2019t hear supernatant being used much in nonscientific speech. However, it\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/supernatant\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Latin progenitor<\/a>\u00a0(also supernatant) is just the third person present conjugation of the verb supernat\u014d which means \u201cto float.\u201d Presumably you could use it to say something like \u201cThe ducks float down the river\u201d if you were speaking latin. In this sense, it\u2019s usage wouldn\u2019t be that uncommon if we all still spoke latin. Alack we do not and must therefore look to other more contemporary uses.<\/p>\n<p>Searching through the news, it was difficult to find examples of supernatant being used outside of science. One recent\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/its-been-102-days-since-the-stock-markets-last-bearish-confession-2017-03-09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Market Watch<\/a>\u00a0article did use it to describe the current heights of the stock market: \u201cSuch a preternatural period of supernatant trade is bordering on insane\u2026.\u201d Here supernatant is an adjective used to denote market growth without any apparent foundation \u2013 the market just seems to float upwards. Uses like this are rare, but perhaps they will pick up as scientific advances and scientists themselves seep ever further into the public eye.<\/p>\n<h2>Future Evolution for Supernatant<\/h2>\n<p>With the practicality of its roots, supernatant is, in some ways, an ideal word. It has only one definition with a very clear meaning. However, supernatant\u2019s lack of use outside science and the outdatedness of it\u2019s roots makes it a rather blatant case of jargon. If you\u2019re a scientist writing a piece for the general public, trying to communicate your work to friends and family, or explaining a procedure to a lab novice, you\u2019d be wise to avoid this word. Nonetheless, it\u2019s interesting that supernatant displays the practicality and functionality that many scientists try to exhibit when designing their experiments. Why come up with a random word for the \u201cliquid that floats above\u201d when supernatant has that exact meaning and serves it\u2019s purpose so well?<\/p>\n<p>As scientists move out of their labs and into other careers perhaps we\u2019ll see the specific meaning of supernatant applied in non-scientific but perfectly apropo situations. The next time I travel to San Francisco for work, I\u2019ll be sure to point out the supernatant fog coming over the bay. The next time we hear about an oil spill maybe we\u2019ll learn of the supernatant oil oozing over the ocean. Both of these uses, while true to the very specific definition of supernatant, serve to drive home the point that the fog and the oil each loom over their counterparts distinctly separate, distinctly unattached, distinctly other. The precision of supernatant\u2019s definition gives us a means of describing anything the floats above and without any real attachment. If supernatant makes its way into common language, it may give people means to more easily describe ideas knocking around in their heads \u2013 the things that are above but separate. Supernatant leaders? The supernatnat 1%? Supernatant values? Even a seemingly boring word like supernatant, which already has great power is describing lab procedures, could have even greater power outside the lab because of its clear and specific meaning.<\/p>\n<p>You\u2019ll see this same theme come up again and again in scientific jargon. A personal favorite \u2013 while the name \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sonic_hedgehog\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">sonic hedgehog<\/a>\u201d may have seemed totally appropriate for the name of a gene discovered in the 90s, even now it doesn\u2019t quite hold up.<\/p>\n<\/body>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Check out this post on scientific jargon that I wrote for my friend Matthew Niederhuber\u2019s blog\u00a0.jargon. Every field has jargon. Marketers talk of leads and conversions, cyclists speak of cadence and derailleurs, and programmers speak of grooming, for-loops, and much more. Jargon is everywhere. Both a boon and bane to understanding, jargon makes it difficult &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/2018\/10\/31\/jargon-the-experts-delight-and-the-novices-bore-supernatant\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Jargon &#8211; The Expert\u2019s Delight and the Novice\u2019s Bore: Supernatant&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[6],"tags":[7],"class_list":["post-181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science-communication","tag-working-in-the-lab"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pap2RX-2V","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":280,"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181\/revisions\/280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tylerjford.com\/landing.html\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}